I find the discussion on the doctoral thesis of Mr values very interesting. Especially because here after Mrs. Hegemann already the second case in the public part with "is not so bad," evaluated. can I have for my homework, and for my master's thesis on the safe side passages copied verbatim from source, so I just during the actual writing or unintentional use or quote this feature immediately: But it is
. I have books set in the reference list, which I actually just rolled the bibliography. And I have definitely written my own initiation. If the comparison is between FAZ and Guttenberg shear initiation only minimal changes can be found, the rest literally without specifying the source has been taken, then that is plagiarism. Then, contrary to all forms of scientific work and, above all, the statement you make with any degree work must be that everything is grown on their own dung. (I mention here only the FAZ, because the easiest way - thanks to their comparison -. Shall be verified)
course, you can close the current time on a media campaign. The work was not published until 2009 so that they could only be tested for about two years by other scientists. And those who have studied it, seem that something more intense than the Bayreuth to have done professors. And only once in passing: It does not matter whether the rest of the work is totally awesome and the science far ahead brings, and to quote now even the taz : shall be for Guttenberg competent Bavarian Administrative Court ruled as 2006 that "the letter or in spirit adoption of text passages from other works without (sufficient) Quote of basic standards of scientific work and therefore violates the assumption of a work as a dissertation usually excludes.
And if I may compare apples to oranges: if someone (illegally) from the Internet is a song download, then screams the music industry, copyright infringement and is therefore equivalent to a certain degree before the court (and I think most people realize that they are actually doing just something illegal, if it is a song Download - copy it to himself). If you copy the intellectual work of another and we do not like it was his own (!) - Then suddenly everything is not so bad? Then pass the time?
As I said, I have written an academic thesis. I know how tedious it is to use all quotes properly and reported. And it is not just a few forgotten footnotes - it comes to whole paragraphs that were copied and not labeled as such. That is (in scientific terms) is not a petty offense and throws a bad light in the Lord of Defence and its credibility. No matter what one might otherwise think of him.
0 comments:
Post a Comment